What am I celebrating this week?
It's the weekend!
The website for young adult author Kate Larkindale. A place for her musings on writing, publishing and a day job in the arts sector.
I had real problems with this book. I really wanted to like it, but there were so many things about it that annoyed me that I struggled to get through it.
This is a book where the entire central conflict could have been solved really, really easily, with a single conversation and I found it difficult to believe that no one else could see this.
Lark and Kasim used to be besties, but over the last year or so, they haven't been talking. One night Kasim is at Lark's house at the invitation of their mother and accidently posts on Lark's Twitter account, saying he's in love with someone who doesn't love him back. Lark, who wants to be a writer has been cultivating their Twitter followers in the hope it will be a good platform when they're published so takes this violation really seriously. But rather than tell the truth, Lark goes along with the story, using it to get closer to someone they're attracted to. That this new relationship send their follower numbers into the stratosphere doesn't hurt either.
But the relationship isn't that great and Lark quickly realises that and has to admit that they'd rather be with Kasim. How can they extricate themselves from a relationship they don't want without making themselves look like a flake online? And how do they tell Kasim how they really feel?
There is a ton of representation in this book. Trans, non-binary, neuro-diverse, Black etc which is great. But is it realistic that there did not seem to be a single kid in this neighborhood who wasn't trans or non-binary? It was never mentioned that the place the kids did their writing class was a community centre for LGBTQIA+ kids, but given that every single one of the students sat somewhere on that spectrum, I guess it must have been or there would have been at least a few straight, cis kids there too.
I didn't get any real writing stuff done over the weekend, unfortunately. I did some blog stuff for the group blog I write for and that took up more time than I thought it would, unfortunately, so I didn't get time to do anything else. But on the plus side, I did get some reading done.
This week I'm going to try and get though a final read-through of my MS before I start querying. I just want to make sure everything works and there are no annoying little typos or grammar errors. So that's my goal for this week (and possibly next week too since I am incredibly slow at this stuff).
What are your goals this week?
It's the end of the week, so it's time to Celebrate the Small things...
I saw this one at the library and just couldn't say no. I loved Election, both the book and the film, so this one was a must-read for me.
Unfortunately, I didn't enjoy it nearly as much as I wanted to. Part of what made Election so much fun was how desperately ambitious Tracy was, and how relentlessly she went after what she wanted. I know it's probably realistic that she's mellowed a bit over time, but this Tracy seemed to have very little in common with the Tracy in the first book.
This Tracy is still living in the hometown she grew up in, and is still, in fact, at the same same high school, now as the assistant principal. She's divorced and has a daughter she's not that close to and few friends. Her mother, who she considered her best friend, has died after a long illness that Tracy nursed her through rather than finishing her law degree.
When the principal announces he's retiring, Tracy knows she wants the job. She thinks she's a shoo in, but just to be sure, supports one of the bigwigs on the school board with his grand plan to create a hall of fame for past students.
The book follows Tracy and the various members of the committee pulling together the hall of fame, plus some potential honourees as the plan to build this edifice is pulled together. As you can imagine, nothing goes quite as planned.
I found this book a quick and easy read, but it was depressing, not comical. Tracy is a shell of the person she used to be, ground down by disappointment and routine. All that spark and ambition and relentless cheer is gone. She has no regrets about the past and what happened, just a kind of wistfulness that her life didn't turn out the way she wanted it to. I suspect underneath her good cheer and acceptance is a raging beast full of fury, but it doesn't ever really come out... There's a single glimpse of it at one point, but it's kind of a blink-and-you'll-miss-it moment.
I suppose it's realistic. Life does grind you down and few people are as bright eyed and confident in their dreams and ambitions at 50 as they were at 15. But that's not that fun to read about, really...
So, if you were a fan of Election, I'd suggest you give this one a miss... It's not a whole lot of fun.
But don't just listen to me. Here's the blurb:
An “engrossing and mordantly funny” ( People ) novel about ambition, coming-of-age in adulthood, and never really leaving high school politics behind—featuring New York Times bestselling author Tom Perrotta’s most iconic character of all time.I don't actually have much in the way of goals this week because I finished all my query package material last week. I guess I should do another read-through of my MS to make sure I'm happy with all the changes I've made and that it all makes sense. Plus, I need to start putting together a list of agents to query this time around.
I really don't feel that excited about it, even though I really like this book. But I really like Standing Too Close too, and I never even got a full request for that one. Querying is so soul destroying, but unfortunately necessary.
What are your goals this week?
This one is a tough one to write about. While I would generally call myself a huge fan of Joyce Carol Oates' writing, I really couldn't get into this particular book.
Set in 1977 Detroit, Hannah is an upper-middle-class wife and mother whose husband is largely inattentive, and whose children are largely taken care of by their live-in Fillippino housekeeper. She is on various boards and committees and it is at a fundraiser for one of these that she comes into contact with YK, a man who brushes her wrist and makes her feel both seen and desired in a way she hasn't been before.
It isn't long before Hannah is heading to YK's hotel, knowing what it is she's going for, but unable to reconcile the fact she is walking toward an affair. This person is not who she sees herself as, but as the book progresses, it is increasingly difficult to see exactly how Hannah sees herself - or even if she sees herself at all.
When Hannah's timid assignations with YK turn violent, she hides her bruises, washes away the evidence and gets on with her life. She tells herself she'll refuse YK's next invitation, but she doesn't and this rendez-vous is more brutal than the last - so much so that she can't hide the results from her husband. He's convinced it has to have been a Black man who did it, and Hannah allows him to believe this rather than admitting to her affair.
In the background of this tawdry little affair is the story on the news; a serial killer is picking off young boys in the city, leaving their freshly washed naked bodies in public places with their laundered clothes folded neatly beside them. Called "Babysitter" by the press, the story has little affect on Hannah until a boy from her own neighborhood goes missing.
There are three threads that weave through this book - Hannah's story, the Babysitter story and the story of a young man whose time in a Catholic boys home exposed him to a well-organised pedophile ring. That all three stories eventually converge is both inevitable and horrifying.
I found this book a frustrating read. I never got a handle on Hannah as a character. She is clearly damaged - she thinks often of her "Joker Daddy" whose abusive behaviour toward her and her mother has apparently warped her sense of self (and possibly her idea of what intimacy and desire should look like). She sees herself only as an object of desire and her self-worth seems so firmly tied to this notion that she's willing to risk everything to remain that.
The story is told in fragments, often out of sequence, so I often found myself trying to piece together a narrative that seemed to be missing too many pieces to ever be whole. But maybe I was just too frustrated with Hannah's lack of agency in her own decisions to see the things I was missing. I know women at this time were often lacking in choices because they had no money or skills for earning it without their husbands, but Hannah seemed even more pathetic than most.
So I don't think I'd recommend this one. I didn't hate it, but here are other, better books by this author that should be read.
But don't just listen to me. Here's the blurb:
From one of America's most renowned storytellers comes a novel about love and deceit, and lust and redemption, against a background of child abductions in the affluent suburbs of Detroit.I managed to finish my query and synopsis over the weekend, so now I'm busy researching agents to approach. I find it difficult to believe I'm almost at this point again, but here we are... I think I should probably do one more pass through the book before I start sending out queries, but I'm just about there.
So that's my main goal this week.
What are you hoping to get done?
Some weeks I hit the weekend and I just don't have the energy or brain capacity to read anything too heavy. This last weekend was one of those, so I picked up a frothy romance from the library so I had something fun to read.
This was a fun one because the two central characters were, at least on the surface, so unmatched in terms of personalities. Although despite Hazel constantly telling us how unconventional she is, I didn't think she was actually that OTT. She was kind of flighty and chaotic, but I know people who are much worse than Hazel is, and they still manage to function in the world.
I have to say, I'm really not a huge fan of main characters telling the reader that kind of thing about themselves. If they are really that kind of character, their actions and the reactions of those around them should show you.
But I digress...This week I'm working on the dreaded synopsis for Guide Us and a query letter. I feel like I'm very close to being ready to query this one, so need to make sure I have everything an agent might request as part of a query package. I hate synopses. Especially when you need ones of all different lengths. I always feel like really important stuff falls by the wayside in the interest of brevity.
For instance, in the book I'm currently working on, Juliet is really close to her twin brother and they look after one another. But somehow that isn't coming through in the synopsis and Jason sounds like a real prick because of some of his actions (which aren't great, I admit, but are not done to hurt Juliet even if they eventually do). But adding details about their relationship adds words to the synopsis without driving the plot forward, so those moments are missed.
But I guess I'll get there in the end. I usually do. Eventually.
So, that's my goal for this week. To get those boring jobs done so I can get this book out into the world in the next month or so..
What are your goals this week?
It's the end of the week, so it's time to Celebrate the Small things...