I expect I'll get lynched for this review, but I promised films I loved and hated, and, well, I really hated this one....
THE
HOBBIT: AN UNEXPECTED JOURNEY
USA/ New Zealand 2012
Running Length: 169
minutes
Cast: Martin
Freeman, Ian McKellan, James Nesbitt, Richard Armitage, Ken Stott, Aidan Turner
Director: Peter Jackson
Screenplay: Fran
Walsh, Peter Jackson, Philippa Boyens and Guillermo del Toro
Cinematography: Andrew
Lesnie
I’ll be honest and say I was never looking forward to seeing
this film. Elves and trolls and
other fantasy creatures do absolutely nothing for me, and although I sat
through all three Lord of the Rings films, I didn’t enjoy them much. So it’s no great surprise that The
Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey did nothing for me.
There is much to be admired about the film, of course. It looks spectacular, especially once
the film moves out of Bag End and into the vast landscapes. The effects are so seamless that it’s
impossible to find the line where reality meets CGI.
Unfortunately, no amount of technical wizardry can make up
for the painfully languorous pace and flabby storytelling. When it was announced that The Hobbit
would be released as two films, I didn’t think it was possible, so when it
became clear that it was going to be three, my heart sank. It’s a slender book with a small story
and translating that into three nearly three-hour epics was always going to
mean stretching things out.
And boy does Jackson stretch things out. Every single scene could easily have
been 10-20 minutes shorter. It
takes 40 minutes of screen time to get Bilbo and his companions on the
road. This might be forgivable if
that 40 minutes had been spent developing the characters of the 13 dwarves so
each was a recognizable individual for some reason other than his facial hair.
Once the company does get on its way, the journey becomes
rather predictable. They get
somewhere, find a threat, fight a battle, escape and move on. To the next location, the next enemy
and the next battle. I admit I
fell asleep for while in the middle, so I may have missed something (I think it
was the elvish village – when I woke up Cate Blanchette was saying goodbye),
but I found the plot repetitive and the constant overlong battle scenes
wearying.
The version I saw was the 3D, 48FPS version, and I have to
say I was impressed by the visual style.
It took some getting used to, and the 48FPS made everything look so real
it was hard to believe I wasn’t standing in the scene with the actors. The problem with this is that you can
see the acting. And the artifice
of the sets and props. It was not
until the film left the Shire that I could settle into the visual language of
the film.
So while I can appreciate the sheer effort and amount of
work that has gone into creating this film, I didn’t find it engaging to
watch. And I certainly won’t be
rushing out to see the next two films in any great hurry.
