tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7363187649278189370.post577936802089436186..comments2024-03-28T04:07:58.140-07:00Comments on Fiction and Film: A question for the blogosphereKate Larkindalehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06202347563426692610noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7363187649278189370.post-43743074646900126822011-03-27T10:27:23.121-07:002011-03-27T10:27:23.121-07:00I've done the chronological one and it comes o...I've done the chronological one and it comes off sounding kind of weird. I'll send it to you later and you can see what you think...Kate Larkindalehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06202347563426692610noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7363187649278189370.post-11948225537003569242011-03-27T05:57:59.117-07:002011-03-27T05:57:59.117-07:00In a query, you'd do what you've done and ...In a query, you'd do what you've done and just focus on the one story, making reference to the other at some point. In a way, I think that makes sense in the synopsis, too.<br /><br />I've heard that in a synopsis, if there are flashbacks, you should do the synopsis in chronological order.<br /><br />I'd play with both of those and see which one comes out better. I'm curious to see the answers as well because I have a story that does something similar.<br /><br />then again, I've put off querying anyone who wants a synopsis (though I'm about to cave) because I dread writing one so...hopefully someone else has the answer for you and I can cheat off your page ;-)Loralie Hallhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07134452749240292803noreply@blogger.com